The Lan­cet Count­down on Health and Cli­ma­te Chan­ge — Poli­cy Brief for Ger­ma­ny

PDF

Intro­duc­tion

The 2024 report of the Lan­cet Count­down1 illus­tra­tes that the nega­ti­ve glo­bal impact of the cli­ma­te cri­sis has rea­ched unpre­ce­den­ted levels — espe­ci­al­ly in terms of our health. Fur­ther delays in the imple­men­ta­ti­on of effec­ti­ve cli­ma­te pro­tec­tion mea­su­res will result in high health, eco­no­mic, social and envi­ron­men­tal cos­ts.2,3 The flood in the Ahr val­ley in 2021, for exam­p­le, not only clai­med 135 lives, but also incur­red esti­ma­ted cos­ts of around 40.5 bil­li­on euro.4 It is the­r­e­fo­re more urgent than ever to take the neces­sa­ry mea­su­res to pre­vent the cli­ma­te cri­sis from wor­sening while streng­thening the sys­te­mic resi­li­encei of the health sec­tor and socie­ty at lar­ge.

Cur­rent poli­ti­cal and social efforts to redu­ce green­house gas (GHG) emis­si­ons in Ger­ma­ny are not ambi­tious enough to achie­ve natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal cli­ma­te tar­gets.6,7 Emis­si­ons in the trans­port and buil­ding sec­tors in par­ti­cu­lar, as well as in land use, are curr­ent­ly well abo­ve the requi­re­ments of the Cli­ma­te Pro­tec­tion Act.7,8 One reason for this is the con­tin­ued finan­cial sup­port for sec­tors that are harmful to the cli­ma­te and the envi­ron­ment, such as the fos­sil fuel sec­tor or the emis­si­ons-inten­si­ve trans­port sec­tor.9,10 Accor­ding to the 2024 report of the Lan­cet Count­down, Ger­ma­ny sub­si­di­sed the use of fos­sil fuels to the tune of US$4.5 bil­li­on in 2022 alo­ne.1 This not only con­tri­bu­tes signi­fi­cant­ly to the cli­ma­te cri­sis, but also has a mas­si­ve nega­ti­ve impact on our health, our eco­sys­tems, and socie­ty.1,2,11

To address the health risks of the cli­ma­te cri­sis, in addi­ti­on to redu­cing sub­si­dies that are harmful to the cli­ma­te and envi­ron­ment, stron­ger cross-sec­to­ral gover­nan­ce and finan­cing of cli­ma­te adapt­a­ti­on mea­su­res as well as cli­ma­te and envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion is requi­red. At the same time, the health sec­tor its­elf must also beco­me more resi­li­ent to the mul­ti­ple cri­ses and redu­ce its cli­ma­te and envi­ron­men­tal impact.12 To this end, it is cru­cial to prio­ri­ti­se health pro­mo­ti­on and pre­ven­ti­on more stron­gly. The pro­mo­ti­on of equi­ta­ble and health pro­mo­ting living con­di­ti­ons would not only reli­e­ve the bur­den on the health­ca­re sys­tem, but also con­tri­bu­te to its needs-ori­en­ted fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment and redu­ce its eco­lo­gi­cal foot­print.13

This poli­cy brief focus­ses on three cen­tral fields of action that have been iden­ti­fied as par­ti­cu­lar­ly urgent and pro­mi­sing for the pro­tec­tion of health, cli­ma­te, and the envi­ron­ment in Ger­ma­ny: Heat Pro­tec­tion, Nut­ri­ti­on, and Resi­li­ent Health Sec­tor. Poli­cy recom­men­da­ti­ons are for­mu­la­ted below for each of the­se fields of action.

Recom­men­da­ti­ons

1

Heat Pro­tec­tion

  • Deve­lo­ping cross-sec­to­ral adapt­a­ti­on of the regu­la­to­ry frame­work: The neces­sa­ry eva­lua­ti­on and adapt­a­ti­on of the exis­ting legal regu­la­to­ry frame­work for heat pro­tec­tion in health must be car­ri­ed out joint­ly across all sec­tors at all decis­i­on-making levels.
  • Maxi­mi­sing health pro­mo­ti­on and pre­ven­ti­on: The plan­ning and imple­men­ta­ti­on of heat pro­tec­tion mea­su­res requi­res an inter­sec­tion­al per­spec­ti­ve as well as the iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and con­side­ra­ti­on of social deter­mi­nants:
  • Streng­thening heat liter­acy: Tar­ge­ted beha­vi­oral pre­ven­ti­on mea­su­res are sui­ta­ble for pro­mo­ting indi­vi­du­al heat liter­acy, i.e., know­ledge of risks and pro­tec­tion opti­ons. Par­ti­cu­lar­ly important are mul­ti­pli­ers, e.g., in health and edu­ca­tio­nal insti­tu­ti­ons.

2

Nut­ri­ti­on

  • Chan­ging finan­cial incen­ti­ves: Taxes and sub­si­dies should be desi­gned in a way that sup­ports the shift towards healt­hy and envi­ron­men­tal­ly fri­end­ly diets.
  • Set­ting stan­dards in com­mu­nal cate­ring: Bin­ding qua­li­ty stan­dards should be intro­du­ced in com­mu­nal cate­ring (e.g., schools, kin­der­gar­tens, cli­nics and care faci­li­ties) in accordance with the new nut­ri­tio­nal recom­men­da­ti­ons by the Ger­man socie­ty for nut­ri­ti­on.
  • Anchoring/Strengthening nut­ri­ti­on in the health sec­tor: Struc­tures and pro­ces­ses should be pro­mo­ted in the health sec­tor that expli­cit­ly pro­mo­te and uti­li­se the pre­ven­ti­ve poten­ti­al of nut­ri­ti­on in rela­ti­on to indi­vi­du­al and pla­ne­ta­ry health.

3

Resi­li­ent Health Sec­tor

  • Finan­cing models for trans­for­ma­ti­on: The fede­ral and sta­te govern­ments must enable neces­sa­ry invest­ments by health­ca­re faci­li­ties in cli­ma­te pro­tec­tion through an addi­tio­nal spe­cial pro­gram­me. Moreo­ver, health sec­tor insti­tu­ti­ons must be con­side­red and inte­gra­ted into the cli­ma­te adapt­a­ti­on stra­tegy.
  • Ancho­ring health in and for all poli­ci­es: Pre­ven­ti­on and health pro­mo­ti­on must be ancho­red as a cross-cut­ting task in line with the health in and for all poli­ci­es approach.
  • Moni­to­ring and sur­veil­lan­ce of GHG emis­si­ons: All lar­ger health­ca­re faci­li­ties should record and report their GHG emis­si­ons accor­ding to stan­dar­di­sed cri­te­ria.
  • Imple­men­ting sus­tainable sup­p­ly and pro­duc­tion chains: Inter­na­tio­nal data­ba­ses with pro­duct car­bon foot­prints as well as regu­la­to­ry incen­ti­ves for sus­tainable pro­duc­tion and recy­cling of medi­cinal pro­ducts and medi­cal devices are requi­red to sur­vey Scope 3 emis­si­ons, which have often only been esti­ma­ted to date, to enable sus­tainable purcha­sing decis­i­ons.

» Read more

Con­tri­bu­ting insti­tu­ti­on

The Lan­cet Count­down Poli­cy Brief for Ger­ma­ny was writ­ten by the Insti­tu­te of Epi­de­mio­lo­gy (EPI) of Helm­holtz Zen­trum Mün­chen, the Pots­dam Insti­tu­te for Cli­ma­te Impact Rese­arch (PIK), the Medi­cal Facul­ty of Lud­wig-Maxi­mi­li­ans-Uni­ver­si­tät Mün­chen and the Com­pe­tence Cent­re for Cli­ma­te Resi­li­ent Medi­ci­ne and Health­ca­re Faci­li­ties (KliMeG). The Ger­man Alli­ance Cli­ma­te Chan­ge and Health (KLUG e.V.) and the Cent­re for Pla­ne­ta­ry Health Poli­cy (CPHP) coor­di­na­ted this pro­cess. The aut­hors of the poli­cy brief are Ann­kath­rin von der Haar (KLUG/ CPHP), Prof. Dr Chris­ti­an Schulz (KLUG), Dr Fran­zis­ka Mat­thies Wies­ler (Helm­holtz Zen­trum Mün­chen), Dr Lisa Pört­ner (PIK/ Cha­ri­té), Dr Peter von Phil­ips­born (LMU Munich), Mau­ri­zio Bär (KLUG/KliMeG), Dr Alex­an­dra Schnei­der (Helm­holtz Zen­trum Mün­chen), Dr Susan­ne Breit­ner-Busch (Helm­holtz Zen­trum Mün­chen and LMU Munich), Dr Julia Schoie­rer (LMU Munich/ eco­lo), Dr Clau­dia Hune­cke (PIK), Dr Mat­thi­as Albrecht (KLUG/ KliMeG) and Doro­thea Baltruks (KLUG/CPHP). The pro­cess was accom­pa­nied by Dr Mar­tin Herr­mann (KLUG), Mai­ke Voss (neu­es Han­deln AG), Prof. Dr Annet­te Peters (Helm­holtz Zen­trum München/LMU Munich), Prof. Dr Her­mann Lot­ze-Cam­pen (PIK) and by the Lan­cet Count­down, in par­ti­cu­lar Dr. Mari­na Roma­nel­lo and Cami­le Oli­vei­ra.

The Poli­cy Brief is sup­port­ed by the Ger­man Medi­cal Asso­cia­ti­on, the Ger­man Asso­cia­ti­on for Pre­ven­ti­on and Health Pro­mo­ti­on (BVPG), the Ger­man Socie­ty for Gene­ral Prac­ti­ce and Fami­ly Medi­ci­ne (DEGAM), the Ger­man Socie­ty for Inter­nal Medi­ci­ne (DGIM) and the Ger­man Socie­ty for Nut­ri­ti­on (DGE).