Natu­re as a Health Resour­ce (NaG): Per­spec­ti­ves and recom­men­da­ti­ons for “Natu­re Pre­scrib­ing” in Ger­ma­ny

Forrest path

© AdobeStock/ aksol


Natu­re as a Health Resour­ce (NaG): Per­spec­ti­ves and recom­men­da­ti­ons for “Natu­re Pre­scrib­ing” in Ger­ma­ny

The clo­se inter­con­nec­tion bet­ween natu­re, the envi­ron­ment and human health is sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly pro­ven: int­act eco­sys­tems pro­mo­te phy­si­cal and men­tal health as well as well-being. They are also essen­ti­al for our resi­li­ence and pro­tec­tion against extre­me wea­ther events.

Some count­ries alre­a­dy app­ly this know­ledge through ‘natu­re pre­scrib­ing’. Medi­cal and the­ra­peu­tic pro­fes­sio­nals employ natu­re-based health inter­ven­ti­ons. The aim is to harness the posi­ti­ve influence of expe­ri­en­cing natu­re on phy­si­cal and men­tal well­be­ing for health pro­mo­ti­on, dise­a­se pre­ven­ti­on and tre­at­ment.

In Ger­ma­ny, natu­re-based health mea­su­res are used spo­ra­di­cal­ly in cli­ni­cal and the­ra­peu­tic con­texts. Howe­ver, the­re is a lack of sys­te­ma­tic inte­gra­ti­on and col­la­bo­ra­ti­on bet­ween rele­vant stake­hol­ders from the fields of health, envi­ron­men­tal and natu­re con­ser­va­ti­on, cli­ma­te pro­tec­tion, urban and land­scape plan­ning, social ser­vices and edu­ca­ti­on.

In view of the inter­lin­ked chal­lenges – rising dise­a­se bur­den, envi­ron­men­tal degra­da­ti­on, loss of bio­di­ver­si­ty and the con­se­quen­ces of cli­ma­te chan­ge – it is cru­cial to harness syn­er­gies and con­sider natu­ral resour­ces as key to both resi­li­ence and health pro­mo­ti­on and pre­ven­ti­on. The pro­ject exami­nes how natu­re-based health mea­su­res can be inte­gra­ted into the Ger­man con­text. It aims, in par­ti­cu­lar, to streng­then the links bet­ween health and envi­ron­men­tal poli­cy. In doing so, it empha­si­s­es that pro­tec­ting natu­re is not mere­ly an envi­ron­men­tal objec­ti­ve, but is also of cru­cial importance for human health and well-being.

Pro­ject aims


The pro­ject exami­nes the con­cept of ‘natu­re pre­scrib­ing’ and pro­s­pects for its imple­men­ta­ti­on in Ger­ma­ny and ther­eby streng­thening health, envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion and natu­re con­ser­va­ti­on.

The main goals include:

  • Eva­lua­ti­on of exis­ting approa­ches: Ana­ly­sis of inter­na­tio­nal and natio­nal expe­ri­en­ces and assess­ment of how the­se can be adapt­ed to the Ger­man con­text.
  • Streng­thening inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry dia­lo­gue: Brin­ging tog­e­ther stake­hol­ders from aca­de­mia, poli­tics and civil socie­ty in the fields of health, envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion and natu­re con­ser­va­ti­on to iden­ti­fy the obs­ta­cles and oppor­tu­ni­ties asso­cia­ted with ‘natu­re pre­scrib­ing’.
  • Deve­lo­p­ment of poli­cy recom­men­da­ti­ons: Deve­lo­p­ment of clear, evi­dence-based recom­men­da­ti­ons for decis­i­on-makers.
  • Pro­mo­ti­on of visi­bi­li­ty and awa­re­ness: Pro­mo­ting an under­stan­ding of natu­re as a health resour­ce among decis­i­on-makers, experts and the gene­ral public.

Over­all, the pro­ject pro­mo­tes more inte­gra­ted poli­cy-making by lin­king health, envi­ron­men­tal pro­tec­tion and natu­re con­ser­va­ti­on.

Metho­do­lo­gy

The Cent­re for Pla­ne­ta­ry Health Poli­cy (CPHP) is lea­ding the ana­ly­sis, stake­hol­der enga­ge­ment and the deve­lo­p­ment of recom­men­da­ti­ons.

Key acti­vi­ties include:

  • Ana­ly­sis of exis­ting approa­ches and rele­vant stake­hol­ders: Revie­w­ing inter­na­tio­nal and natio­nal models and initia­ti­ves on ‘natu­re pre­scrib­ing’ and iden­ti­fy­ing key stake­hol­ders.
  • Dia­lo­gues with stake­hol­ders: Orga­ni­s­ing work­shops with experts from the fields of health, the envi­ron­ment, social affairs, civil socie­ty, sci­ence and poli­tics to exch­an­ge know­ledge, iden­ti­fy needs and gain prac­ti­cal insights for pro­s­pec­ti­ve imple­men­ta­ti­on stra­te­gies.
  • Inter­views with key stake­hol­ders: Con­duc­ting qua­li­ta­ti­ve inter­views to bet­ter under­stand expe­ri­en­ces from imple­men­ta­ti­on, as well as the oppor­tu­ni­ties and bar­riers to appli­ca­ti­on in Ger­ma­ny.
  • Recom­men­da­ti­ons for action: Sum­ma­ri­sing the fin­dings in a poli­cy brief – a short, easi­ly under­stan­da­ble docu­ment with clear recom­men­da­ti­ons for decis­i­on-makers.
  • Dis­se­mi­na­ti­on: Sha­ring the fin­dings via web­i­nars and digi­tal for­mats to reach decis­i­on-makers, prac­ti­tio­ners and rele­vant net­works, and to rai­se the pro­fi­le of the issue.

Through this approach, the CPHP con­nects stake­hol­ders, trans­la­tes sci­en­ti­fic fin­dings into prac­ti­cal recom­men­da­ti­ons and sup­ports infor­med decis­i­on-making.

The pro­ject is fun­ded by the Fede­ral Agen­cy for Natu­re Con­ser­va­ti­on (BfN), which recei­ves fun­ding from the Fede­ral Minis­try for the Envi­ron­ment, Cli­ma­te Action, Natu­re Con­ser­va­ti­on and Nuclear Safe­ty (BMUKN).

Focus Area

Exter­nal resour­ces

Pro­ject dura­ti­on

April 2026 — March 2028

Cont­act per­son

Part­ner

Logo BMUKN
BfN