Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 5, 2022

Responding to the climate crisis – bridging the gap between public health ethics and environmental ethics

Ethik der Klimakrise – Wie und warum eine Kluft zwischen Public Health-Ethik und Umweltethik überbrückt werden sollte
  • Cristian Timmermann ORCID logo , Katharina Wabnitz ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Verina Wild ORCID logo
From the journal Public Health Forum

Abstract

The climate crisis is a major public health ethics problem that needs to be addressed using a broad set of ethical tools to analyse the manifold ethical issues. To enrich the discourse, we suggest to bridge the gap between environmental ethics and public health ethics. A planetary health ethics could help to develop a holistic perspective and create awareness about the multiple ethically relevant interactions between humans and the environment.

Zusammenfassung

Die Klimakrise ist ein aus gesundheitsethischer Sicht komplexes Problem, das mit verschiedenen ethischen Instrumenten angegangen werden muss. Um den Diskurs zu bereichern, sollten wir die Kluft zwischen Public Health-Ethik und Umweltethik überbrücken. Eine planetare Gesundheitsethik könnte helfen, eine ganzheitliche Perspektive zu entwickeln und ein Bewusstsein für die vielen ethisch relevanten Wechselwirkungen zwischen Mensch und Umwelt zu schaffen.

  1. Autorenerklärung

  2. Autor*innenbeteiligung: Alle Autor*innen tragen Verantwortung für den gesamten Inhalt dieses Artikels und haben der Einreichung des Manuskripts zugestimmt. Finanzierung: Die Autor*innen erklären, dass sie keine finanzielle Förderung erhalten haben. Interessenkonflikt: Die Autor*innen erklären, dass kein wirtschaftlicher oder persönlicher Interessenkonflikt vorliegt. Ethisches Statement: Für die Forschungsarbeit wurden weder von Menschen noch von Tieren Primärdaten erhoben.

  3. Author Declaration

  4. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. Funding: Authors state no funding involved. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest. Ethical statement: Primary data for human nor for animals were not collected for this research work.

References

1. Romanello M, McGushin A, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Hughes N, Jamart L, et al. The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. Lancet 2021;398:P1619–62.Search in Google Scholar

2. Abbasi M, Majdzadeh R, Zali A, Karimi A, Akrami F. The evolution of public health ethics frameworks: systematic review of moral values and norms in public health policy. Med Health Care Philos 2018;21:387–402.10.1007/s11019-017-9813-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Castillo RM, Sun L, Xue J. Global carbon inequality. Energy Ecol Environ 2017;2:361–9.10.1007/s40974-017-0072-9Search in Google Scholar

4. Myers S, Frumkin H. Planetary health: protecting nature to protect ourselves. Island Press, 2020.10.5822/978-1-61091-966-1Search in Google Scholar

5. Lakhani N. Cop26 legitimacy questioned as groups excluded from crucial talks. Guardian 2021.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wu J, Snell G, Samji H. Climate anxiety in young people: a call to action. Lancet Planet Health 2020;4:e435–6.10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30223-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Ojala M, Cunsolo A, Ogunbode CA, Middleton J. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: a narrative review. Ann Rev Environ Resour 2021;46:35–58.10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716Search in Google Scholar

8. Powers M, Faden RR. Social justice: the moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

9. Venkatapuram S. Health justice: an argument from the capabilities approach. New York: Polity, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Mielck A, Wild V. Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit - Auf dem Weg von Daten zu Taten. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

11. Samra R, Hankivsky O. Adopting an intersectionality framework to address power and equity in medicine. Lancet 2021;397:857–9.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32513-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Willison DJ, Ondrusek N, Dawson A, Emerson C, Ferris LE, Saginur R, et al. What makes public health studies ethical? Dissolving the boundary between research and practice. BMC Medical Ethics 2014;15:61.10.1186/1472-6939-15-61Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. WBGU. Welt im Wandel Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

14. Otto IM, Donges JF, Cremades R, Bhowmik A, Hewitt RJ, Lucht W, et al. Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117:2354–65.10.1073/pnas.1900577117Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Brennan A, Lo Y-S. Environmental ethics. In: Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nussbaum MC. Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press: Harvard University Press, 2006. xiii, 487.10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftwSearch in Google Scholar

17. Rozzi R. South American environmental philosophy: Ancestral Amerindian roots and emergent academic branches. Environ Ethics 2012;34:343–66.10.5840/enviroethics201234436Search in Google Scholar

18. Richie C. Guest Editorial: Sustainability and bioethics: where we have been, where we are, where we are going. New Bioeth 2020;26:82–90.10.1080/20502877.2020.1767920Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Macpherson CC, Smith E, Rieder TN. Does health promotion harm the environment? New Bioeth 2020;26:158–75.10.1080/20502877.2020.1767918Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dwyer JF. Environmental Justice, Ethics, and Public Health. The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics.Search in Google Scholar

21. Resnik DB. Environmental health ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.10.1017/CBO9781139161848Search in Google Scholar

22. Lee LM. A bridge back to the future: public health ethics, bioethics, and environmental ethics. Am J Bioeth 2017;17:5–12.10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Foster A, Cole J, Farlow A, Petrikova I. Planetary health ethics: beyond first principles. Challenges 2019;10:14.10.3390/challe10010014Search in Google Scholar

24. Drews S, Van den Bergh JC. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim Policy 2016;16:855–76.10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240Search in Google Scholar

25. Redvers N. The value of global indigenous knowledge in planetary health. Challenges 2018;9:30.10.3390/challe9020030Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-03-05
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

©2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pubhef-2021-0141/pdf
Scroll to top button